References

1. Cochrane AL. Effectiveness and Efficiency. Random Reflections on Health Services. London: Nuffield Provincial Hospitals Trust, 1972. (Reprinted in 1989 in association with the BMJ.)

2. Cochrane AL. 1931-1971: a critical review, with particular reference to the medical profession. In: Medicines for the Year 2000. London: Office of Health Economics, 1979: 1-11.

3. Cochrane AL. Foreword. In: Chalmers I, Enkin M, Keirse MJNC, eds. Effective Care in Pregnancy and Childbirth. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989.

4. Chalmers I, Dickersin K, Chalmers TC. Getting to grips with Archie Cochrane's agenda. BMJ 1992;305:786-8.

5. Editorial. Cochrane's legacy. Lancet 1992;340:1131-2.

6. Chalmers I. The Cochrane Collaboration: preparing, maintaining and disseminating systematic reviews of the effects of health care. In: Warren KS, Mosteller F, eds. Doing more good than harm: the evaluation of health care interventions. Ann NY Acad Sci 1993;703: 156-63.

7. Williams HC, Adetugbo K, Li Wan Po A, Naldi L, Diepgen T, Murrell D. The Cochrane Skin Group. Preparing, maintaining, and disseminating systematic reviews of clinical interventions in dermatology. Arch Dermatol 1998;134:1620-6.

8. Delamere FM, Williams HC. How can hand searching the dermatological literature help people with skin problems? Arch Dermatol 2001;137:332-5.

9. Gibbs S, Harvey I, Sterling JC, Stark R. Local treatments for cutaneous warts (Cochrane Review). In: Cochrane Collaboration. Cochrane Library. Issue 3. Oxford: Update Software, 2001.

10. Parker ER, Schilling LM, Williams HC, Diba V, Delavalle RP. What's the point of systematic reviews in dermatology if all they show is "insufficient evidence"? J Am Acad Dermatol in press.

11. Jessop S, Whitelaw D, Jordaan F. Drugs for discoid lupus erythematosus (Cochrane Review). In: Cochrane Collaboration. Cochrane Library. Issue 3. Oxford: Update Software, 2001.

12. Adetugbo K, Williams H. How well are randomized controlled trials reported in the dermatology literature? Arch Dermatol 2000;136:381-5.

13. Moher D, Schulz KF, Altman DG et al. The CONSORT Statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials. Ann Intern Med 2001; 134:657-62.

14. Clarke M, Hopewell S. Time lag bias in publishing results of clinical trials: a systematic review. 3rd Symposium on Systematic Reviews: Beyond the Basics. Oxford: Centre for Statistics in Medicine, 2000.

15. Current Controlled Trials. http://controlled-trials.com

16. Department of Health. Research and Development, Current Research: The National Research Register. http://www.doh.gov.uk/research/nrr.htm

17. Delamare F, Cochrane Skin Group. http://www.nottingham. ac.uk/~muzd/

18. Sterne JAC, Bartlett C, Juni P, Egger M. Do we need comprehensive literature searches? A study of publication and language bias in meta-analyses of controlled trials. 3rd Symposium on Systematic Reviews: Beyond the Basics. Oxford, 2000.

Part 2: The critical appraisal toolbox

Editor: Michael Bigby

Was this article helpful?

0 0
Getting Rid Of Warts Forever

Getting Rid Of Warts Forever

All wart sufferers, this is the day to stop the shame. How I Got Rid Of My Warts Forever and How You Can Get Rid Of Warts Naturally In 3 Days. With No Blisters, No Scars, And No Pain Without medications or expensive procedures. All by applying a simple, very natural and unbelievable FREE substance that can be found in almost every household.

Get My Free Ebook


Post a comment