1. Kallioniemi, A.; Kallioniemi, O.P.; Sudar, D.; Rutovitz, D.; Gray, J.W.; Waldman, F.; Pinkel, D. Comparative genomic hybridization for molecular cytogenetic analysis of solid tumors. Science 1992, 258, 818-821.

2. Kallioniemi, O.P.; Kallioniemi, A.; Piper, J.; Isola, J.; Waldman, F.M.; Gray, J.W.; Pinkel, D. Optimizing comparative genomic hybridization for analysis of DNA sequence copy number changes in solid tumors. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 1994, 10, 231-243.

3. Piper, J.; Rutovitz, D.; Sudar, D.; Kallioniemi, A.; Kallioniemi, O.P.; Waldman, F.M.; Gray, J.W.; Pinkel, D. Computer image analysis of comparative genomic hybridization. Cytometry 1995, 19, 10-26.

4. Kirchhoff, M.; Rose, H.; Lundsteen, C. High resolution comparative genomic hybridisation in clinical cytogenetics. J. Med. Genet. 2001, 38, 740-744.

5. Mitelman, F. Catalog of Chromosome Aberrations in Cancer; Wiley-Liss: New York, 1994.

6. Najfeld, V. FISHing among myeloproliferative disorders. Semin. Hematol. 1997, 34, 55-63.

7. Becher, R.; Korn, W.M.; Prescher, G. Use of fluorescence in situ hybridization and comparative genomic hybridization in the cytogenetic analysis of testicular germ cell tumors and uveal melanomas. Cancer Genet. Cytogenet. 1997, 93, 22-28.

8. Levy, B.; Gershin, I.F.; Desnick, R.J.; Babu, A.; Gelb, B.D.; Hirschhorn, K.; Cotter, P.D. Characterization of a de novo unbalanced chromosome rearrangement by comparative genomic hybridization and fluorescence in situ hybridization. Cytogenet. Cell Genet. 1997, 76, 68- 15. 71.

9. Levy, B.; Dunn, T.M.; Kaffe, S.; Kardon, N.; Hirschhorn,

K. Clinical applications of comparative genomic hybrid- 16. ization. Genet. Med. 1998, 1, 4-12.

10. Gardner, R.J.M.; Sutherland, G.R. Chromosome Abnormalities and Genetic Counseling; Oxford University Press:

11. Levy, B.; Papenhausen, P.R.; Tepperberg, J.H.; Dunn, T.M.; Fallet, S.; Magid, M.S.; Kardon, N.B.; Hirschhorn, K.; Warburton, P.E. Prenatal molecular cytogenetic diagnosis of partial tetrasomy 10p due to neocentromere formation in an inversion duplication analphoid marker 18. chromosome. Cytogenet. Cell Genet. 2000, 91, 165170.

12. Levy, B.; Dunn, T.M.; Kern, J.H.; Hirschhorn, K.; Kardon, N.B. Delineation of the dup5q phenotype by molecular cytogenetic analysis in a patient with dup5q/del 5p (cri du 19. chat). Am. J. Med. Genet. 2002, 108, 192-197.

13. Wilton, L.; Williamson, R.; McBain, J.; Edgar, D.; Voullaire, L. Birth of a healthy infant after preimplantation confirmation of euploidy by comparative genomic hybridization. N. Engl. J. Med. 2001, 345, 1537-1541. 20.

14. Wells, D.; Escudero, T.; Levy, B.; Hirschhorn, K.; Delhanty, J.D.A.; Munne, S. First clinical application of comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) and polar body testing for preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) of aneuploidy. Fertil. Steril. 2002, 78, 543-549.

Wells, D.; Levy, B. Cytogenetics in reproductive medicine: The contribution of comparative genomic hybridization (CGH). Bioessays 2003, 25, 289-300. Munne, S.; Lee, A.; Rosenwaks, Z.; Grifo, J.; Cohen, J. Diagnosis of major chromosome aneuploidies in human preimplantation embryos. Hum. Reprod. 1993, 8, 21852191.

Delhanty, J.D.; Harper, J.C.; Ao, A.; Handyside, A.H.; Winston, R.M. Multicolour FISH detects frequent chromosomal mosaicism and chaotic division in normal preimplantation embryos from fertile patients. Hum. Genet. 1997, 99, 755-760.

Iwarsson, E.; Lundqvist, M.; Inzunza, J.; Ahrlund-Richter, L.; Sjoblom, P.; Lundkvist, O.; Simberg, N.; Nordenskjold, M.; Blennow, E. A high degree of aneuploidy in frozen-thawed human preimplantation embryos. Hum. Genet. 1999, 104, 376-382.

Solinas-Toldo, S.; Lampel, S.; Stilgenbauer, S.; Nickolenko, J.; Benner, A.; Dohner, H.; Cremer, T.; Lichter, P. Matrix-based comparative genomic hybridization: Biochips to screen for genomic imbalances. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 1997, 20, 399-407.

Pinkel, D.; Segraves, R.; Sudar, D.; Clark, S.; Poole, I.; Kowbel, D.; Collins, C.; Kuo, W.L.; Chen, C.; Zhai, Y.; Dairkee, S.H.; Ljung, B.M.; Gray, J.W.; Albertson, D.G. High resolution analysis of DNA copy number variation using comparative genomic hybridization to microarrays. Nat. Genet. 1998, 20, 207-211.

Was this article helpful?

0 0
10 Ways To Fight Off Cancer

10 Ways To Fight Off Cancer

Learning About 10 Ways Fight Off Cancer Can Have Amazing Benefits For Your Life The Best Tips On How To Keep This Killer At Bay Discovering that you or a loved one has cancer can be utterly terrifying. All the same, once you comprehend the causes of cancer and learn how to reverse those causes, you or your loved one may have more than a fighting chance of beating out cancer.

Get My Free Ebook

Post a comment