Expectancy Theory Of Work

WORK/CAREER/OCCUPATION, THEORIES OF.

EXPECTANCY-VALUE THEORY/MODEL. See DECISION-MAKING THEORIES; REASONED ACTION AND PLANNED BEHAVIOR THEORIES; ROTTER'S SOCIAL LEARNING THEORY; TOLMAN'S THEORY.

EXPECTED UTILITY THEORY. = utility theory. The Hungarian-born American mathematician John von Neumann (19031957) and the German-born American economist Oskar Morgenstern (1902-1977) formulated the modern version of expected utility theory of decision-making which indicates that a human decision-maker chooses strategies/actions that maximize "expected utility" (i.e., the average subjective desirability of an outcome/event associated with one's decision or preference for it - calculated by multiplying each of the possible outcomes of the decision by its probability and then summing the resulting products), and where utilities are determined by "revealed preferences" (i.e., a preference inferred from observations of a decision-maker's actual choices) [cf., maximizing/op- timizing hypothesis - posits that people act so as to gain as much utility (regarding happiness, money, etc.) as possible; this is in contrast to the American economist/psychologist Herbert Alexander Simon's (1916-2001) satisficing hypothesis which holds that people act to gain only a certain satisfactory utility level]. When the probabilities are phrased in subjective terms, it is called subjective expected utility theory - formulated by the American decision-theorist Leonard J. Savage (1917-1971) and named by the American psychologist Ward Denis Edwards (1927) - which suggests that a decision-maker chooses an alternative or strategy that maximizes the expected utility of an event/outcome calculated from "subjective probabilities" (degree of belief; cf., taxicab problem) rather than from "objective probabilities" (relative frequencies of observable events). The general notion of utility for decision-making was first indicated in 1738 by the Swiss physicist /mathematician Daniel Bernoulli (1700-1782)

who discussed "moral worth" and explained that the value of something to a person is not simply equivalent to its monetary value, but is based, also, on its subjective "moral worth" (i.e., utility). See also ALLAIS PARADOX/ EFFECT; DECISION-MAKING THEORIES; PASCAL'S PROPOSITION OR WAGER; PROBABILITY THEORY/LAWS; PROSPECT THEORY; TAXICAB PROBLEM/ EFFECT; WELLS EFFECT. REFERENCES

Bernoulli, D. (1738/1968). Hydrodynamica.

New York: Dover. Neumann, J. von, & Morgenstern, O. (1947).

Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Edwards, W. D. (1954). The theory of decision-making. Psychological Bulletin, 51, 380-417. Savage, L. J. (1954). The foundations of statistics. New York: Wiley. Simon, H. A. (1957). Models of man: Social and rational. New York: Wiley. Lurie, S. (1987). A parametric model of utility for two-person distributions. Psychological Review, 94, 42-60. Rapoport, A. (1987). Research paradigms and expected utility models for the provision of step-level public goods. Psychological Review, 94, 74-83. Luce, R. D. (2000). Utility of gains and losses: Measurement, theoretical, and experimental approaches. Mah-wah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Conquering Fear In The 21th Century

Conquering Fear In The 21th Century

The Ultimate Guide To Overcoming Fear And Getting Breakthroughs. Fear is without doubt among the strongest and most influential emotional responses we have, and it may act as both a protective and destructive force depending upon the situation.

Get My Free Ebook


Post a comment