1 Christie B. Panel needed to combat research fraud. BMJ 1999;319:1222.

2 Jones J. UK watchdog issues guidelines to combat medical research fraud. BMJ 1999; 319:660-1.

3 Department of Health. Draft research governance framework for health and social care. London: DOH, September 2000.

4 NHS Executive. West Midlands Regional Office report of a review of the research framework in North Staffordshire Hospital NHS Trust. May 2000.

5 Neuberger J. Ethics and health care. Kings Fund Institute Research Report 47, 1992.

6 World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki. Recommendations guiding physicians in biomedical research involving human subjects. Adopted by the 18th WMA General Assembly, Helsinki, Finland, June 1964 and amended by the 29th WMA General Assembly, Tokyo, Japan, October 1975; 35th WMA General Assembly, Venice, Italy, October 1983; 41st WMA General Assembly, Hong Kong, September 1989; 48th WMA General Assembly, Somerset West, Republic of South Africa, October 1996; and the 52nd WMA General Assembly, Edinburgh, Scotland, October 2000.

7 Smith T. Ethics in medical research. A handbook of good practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.

8 Emanuel E, Wendler D, Grady C. What makes clinical research ethical? JAMA 2000;283:2701-11.

9 Paul C. Internal and external morality of medicine: lessons from New Zealand. BMJ 2000;320:499-503.

10 Royal College of Physicians of London. Guidelines on the practice of ethics committees in medical research involving human subjects (2nd edn). London: RCP, 1990; (3rd edn). London: RCP, 1996.

11 Department of Health. Local research ethics committees. London: DOH, 1991 HSG(91)5.

12 Department of Health. Ethics Committee Review of multi-centre research. London: DOH, 1997 HSG(97)23.

13 Commission of the European Communities; CPMP Working Party on Efficacy of Medicinal Products. Notes for guidance on good clinical practice for trials on medicinal products in the European Community. Brussels: European Community, 1991.

14 International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Regulation of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use. Tripartite guideline for good clinical practice. Geneva: IFPMA, 1996.

15 Smith R. Time to face up to research misconduct. BMJ 1996;312:789-90.

16 Farthing MJG. An editor's response to fraudsters. BMJ 1998;316:1726-33.

17 Carnall D. Doctor struck off for scientific fraud. BMJ 1996;312:400.

18 Dyer C. Doctor admits research fraud BMJ 1998;316:645.

19 Horton, R. Retraction: Interferon Behcet's disease. Lancet 2000;356:1292.

20 Dobson R. US research scientist found guilty of fraud. BMJ 1999;319:1156.

21 Dyer O. GP found guilty of forging trial consent forms. BMJ 1998;317:1475.

22 Bosch X. Three jailed in bribery and prescription fraud scandal. BMJ 1999;319:1026.

23 Tuffs A. Fraud investigation concludes that self regulation has failed. BMJ 2000;321:72.

24 Gottlieb S. Breast cancer researcher accused of serious scientific misconduct. BMJ 2000;320:398.

25 Dyer C. GP struck off for fraud in drug trials. BMJ 1996;312:798.

26 Dyer C. London professor struck off for bullying and dishonesty. BMJ 1999;319:938.

27 Rennie D. An American perspective on research integrity. BMJ 1998;316:1726-33.

28 Pownall M. Falsifying data is main problem in US research fraud review. BMJ 1999;318:1164.

29 Smith R. Cheating at medical school. BMJ 2000;321:398.

30 Blunt J, Savulescu J, Watson AJM. Meeting the challenge facing research ethics committees: some practical suggestions. BMJ 1998;316:58-61.

31 Royal College of Physicians of London. Report on fraud and misconduct in medical research. London: RCP, 1991.

32 Alberti KGMM. Multicentre research ethics committees: has the cure been worse than the disease? BMJ 2000;320:1157-8.

33 Department of Health. Briefing pack for research ethics committee members. London: DOH,


34 Medical Research Council. MRC policy and procedure for inquiring into allegations of scientific misconduct. London: MRC, December 1997 (MRC ethics series).

35 Medical Research Council. Guidelines for good clinical practice in clinical trials. MRC, March


36 Medical Research Council. Human tissue and biological samples for use in research: MRC interim operational and ethical guidelines. Consultation November 1999. London: MRC,


37 Royal College of Pathologists. Consensus statement of recommended policies for uses of human tissue in research, education and quality control. London: RCP, 1999.

38 Royal College of Pathologists. Guidelines for the retention of tissues at post-mortem examination. London: RCP, March 2000.

39 Medical Research Council. Personal information in medical research: MRC guidelines. MRC/55/00. London: MRC, 5 October 2000 (MRC ethics series).

40 Department of Health. Ethical review of multicentre research in the NHS where there is no local researcher. London: DOH, November 2000.

Was this article helpful?

0 0

Post a comment