1 Riis P. Creating a national control system on scientific dishonesty within health sciences. In: Lock S, Wells F, eds. Fraud and misconduct in medical research. London: BMJ, 1996, pp.114-17.

2 Riis P. Prevention and management of fraud-in theory. J Int Med 1994;235:107-13.

3 Proceedings of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh. Consensus Statement. Fraud and misconduct in medical research Suppl. No. 7, Jan 2000.

4 Institute of Medicine. The responsible conduct of research in the health sciences. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1989.

5 Evans I. Conduct unbecoming - the MRC's approach. BMJ 1998;316:1728-9.

6 Radda G. How should we prevent it. Proc R Coll Physicians Edinb 2000;30:25.

7 Kalichman MW, Friedman PJ. A pilot study of biomedical trainees' perceptions concerning research ethics. Acad Med 1992;67:769-75.

8 Sachs GA, Siegler M. Teaching scientific integrity and the responsible conduct of research. Acad Med 1993;68:871-5.

9 Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Report of the independent inquiry into circumstances surrounding the publication of two articles in the British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. London: RCOG, 1995.

10 Allen G. Raw data. Nature 1998;339:500.

11 Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Harmonisation. Appendix 7. Guideline for good clinical practice. Brussels, 1997.

12 Wells FO. Clinical research fraud and misconduct: how is it diagnosed? Proc R Coll Physicians Edinb 2000;30:13-17.

13 Carnell D. Doctor struck off for scientific fraud. BMJ 1996;312:400.

14 Beecham L. GMC urged to be more radical. BMJ 2000;321:725.

15 Farthing MJG. What is the role of peer review? Proc R Coll Physicians Edinb 2000;30:23.

16 Williams N. Editors seek ways to cope with fraud. Science 1997;278:1221.

17 Committee on Publication Ethics. Annual Report 1999. London: BMJ Publishing Group, 1999.

18 Lock S. Lessons from the Pearce affair: handling scientific fraud. BMJ 1995;310:547-8.

19 Wilmshurst P.The code of silence. Lancet 1977;349:567-9.

20 La Follette M. Stealing into print. Berkley: University of California Press, 1992, pp. 137-55.

21 General Medical Council. Good medical practice. London: GMC, 1998.

22 Irvine D. How should we respond? Proc R Coll Physicians Edinb 2000;30:24.

23 AMRC Position Statement.

24 Wells F. Fraud and misconduct in medical research. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1997;43:3-7.

25 Mayor S. New governance framework for NHS research aims to stop fraud. BMJ 2000; 321:725.

26 Chalmers SI, Gray M, Sheldon T. Prospective registration of health care research would help. BMJ 1995;311:262.

27 Dews IM, Vandenburg MJ, Preventing fraud. BMJ 1991;302:907.

28 Department of Health. Good laboratory practice.The United Kingdom compliance programme. London: DoH, 1989.

29 United States Code of Federal Regulations.Title 21: Sections 50, 56 and 312.

30 Committee for Proprietary Medical Products. Good clinical practice. Brussels: CPMP, 1991.

31 Brown L. Pharmaceutical industry follows guidelines on conduct of research. BMJ 1998;317:1590.

32 Thomas G. Preventing fraud. BMJ 1991;302:660.

33 Hillman H. Some aspects do not fall within remit of bodies examining fraud. BMJ 1998; 317:1591.

34 Skinner A. Quality not quantity in NHS research output should be used as a yardstick of ability. BMJ 1998;317:1590.

35 Forbes CD. Why does it happen? Proc R Coll Physicians Edinb 2000;30:22-3.

36 Rennie D. Dealing with research misconduct in the United Kingdom. BMJ 1998;316:1726-33.

37 Rennie D.Why is action needed? Proc R Coll Physcians Edinb 2000;30:22.

38 Breimer L. Fair and efficient systems of investigating alleged misconduct can be devised. BMJ 1998;317:1590.

39 Duff G. The researcher perspective. Proc R Coll Physicians Edinb 2000;30:26.

40 Lock S. Misconduct in medical research: does it exist in Britain? BMJ 1988;297:1531-5.

41 Broad W, Wade N. Betrayal of the truth. Simon and Schuster, 1982.

42 Commission on Research Integrity. Integrity and misconduct in research. Report of the Commission on Research Integrity to the Secretary of Health and Human Services, the House Committee on Commerce and the Senate Committee on Labor and Human Resources. Rockville, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service. 1995.

43 Evans SJW. How common is it? Proc R Coll Physicians Edinb 2000;30:9-11.

44 Medical Research Council. MRC policy for inquiry into allegations of scientific misconduct. London, MRC, 1997 (Ethics Series).

45 Royal College of Physicians. Fraud and misconduct in medical research. London: RCP, 1991.

46 Chantler C, Chantler S. Deception: difficulties and initiatives. BMJ 1998;316:1731-2.

Was this article helpful?

0 0

Post a comment